Changing Jobs in China, Losing Competitiveness

Posted November 13th, 2007 by Josh

Switching jobs this week has gotten me thinking about about just how short stints at one company tend to be in China. I always find it amazing the amount of job hopping people do, and how much it must cost in lost GDP. Rarely have I seen employees spend more than three years in a private firm. It almost seems like people believe not changing is a sign that they lack upward mobility.

One of the strangest phenomena is that Chinese will often leave one job for another, even if the new position is neither of higher stature, nor pay. It is almost like a sports GM who makes trades just to keep changing the make-up of the team, even if it does not actually improve anything. There is little consideration given toward office chemistry, loyalty to employer, or even upward mobility in one place (it’s the anti-Japan).

Not all of the blame falls on the workers. On the contrary, businesses are often looking more to save every last penny and forget to give employees incentives to stay. If there were a stronger culture of treating employees well, probably this problem would not exist.

So petty, are some firms, that they often structure contracts in ways specifically designed to squeeze an employee when he leaves. For example, one friend recently switched jobs, but since his company does not pay him until the 18th of the following month, he found himself in the odd position of not being able to tell his employer that he had started elsewhere. Basically he knew they would refuse to pay him for the full month of work that he had completed, so instead of informing them he just stopped showing up at the office, waiting for pay day to tell them formally, and gave them no time to find a replacement. But really, what other option did he have other than forgo a month’s pay? In that kind of environment, why would anyone feel a sense of loyalty.

Clearly this poor employer-employee relationship in endemic at local firms. One of the great advantages of China is its low cost of labor. Unfortunately, sometimes this is taken for granted and employers forget the basic rules of reducing turnover. Extra benefits that keep employees happy, tend to make them more productive too . There is significant data that indicates granting maternity leave, offering flexible hours, and providing childcare actually benefit a company’s bottom line through improved output, reduced training costs associated with new hires, and retention of top talent.

Like with so many other things in modern China, the size of the economic boom, and the room to make profits, obscures some serious, fundamental problems with the way firms do business here. As the economy matures and labor costs are decreasingly the primary advantage to being in China, I strongly suspect high turnover rates will begin to undercut the country’s competitiveness.

Share This

3 Responses to: “Changing Jobs in China, Losing Competitiveness”

  1. Paul M responds:
    Posted: November 13th, 2007 at 2:05 pm

    How to send you an email?

  2. Larry responds:
    Posted: November 14th, 2007 at 8:58 am

    If people can disappear for days and still collecting paycheck, I wonder how productive people really are, even if they sit at their desks.

    Unless people are paid on piece work, it is very difficult to determine how productive a person is. Loyalty is the only thing that makes people productive, creative and pay attention to quality of work. If people don’t care about the firm they work for, what is the quality of products are they producing ?

  3. Yuefei responds:
    Posted: November 14th, 2007 at 10:01 pm

    Retaining good talent is a challenge anywhere in the world. Attracting bright & ambitious employees in China probably has alot of similarities with other countries. The common thing here is not culture or nationality, but the company or corporation. What are the causes of turnover in China? Inadequate salary, lack of career path, professional development, a stimulating atmosphere. Sound familiar?

    Concerning, loyalty, I recently spoke to a tech recruiter in the US. All of his fortune 500 clients are seeking to hire contractors for 3 to 6 months. No loyalty there…this would seem to undermine the argument that loyalty = productivity/creativity. I would also point to government as additional evidence against this equation.

Post a Comment

Enter Your Details:


Enter Your Comments:

Comments are subject to approval. If your comment does not immediately appear please be patient



Note: This is the end of the usable page. The image(s) below are preloaded for performance only.